Starc's rousing return, Narine's ripping offbreak

Plays of the day from Australia’s bonus-point win over West Indies at Providence

Daniel Brettig05-Jun-2016The Starc re-startAustralia’s bowling attack had lacked the threat of high pace since December last year, when Mitchell Johnson’s retirement was swiftly followed by Mitchell Starc having to undergo foot surgery. Upon completing his rehab, Starc was back in Guyana, and he showed the difference his pace could make. In the very first over, Andre Fletcher was scrambling to get some bat on a full toss that swung back late, before throwing his hands at a ball skating across him and slicing a catch to backward point. Starc’s rhythm and direction were not quite at 2015 World Cup levels, but he had lost none of his speed.The weight of numbersFrom the start of his spell, Nathan Lyon gained just the right amount of turn to threaten the stumps from around the wicket. However, he had a hard time extracting a raised finger from umpire Gregory Brathwaite, who turned down four lbw appeals, of which at least two were shown by ball tracking to be solidly striking the stumps. In his younger days, Lyon might have grown frustrated but, on Sunday, he remained patient and improved his rhythm until Brathwaite upheld a fifth appeal, this time against Marlon Samuels. Glenn Maxwell was able to win Brathwaite’s favour a little sooner, having Denesh Ramdin lbw from the same angle.The hustleChasing a modest total, Australia’s openers approached the innings with business-like intent. David Warner sat back in the crease to shovel Sunil Narine’s second ball of the innings to the midwicket boundary, and his running between the wickets was all energy and hustle, pushing the West Indies fielders by repeatedly looking for a second run. The Providence Stadium crowd was roused into an expectant cheer several times by the sound of the bails being broken, but Warner was always one step ahead.The offbreakBefore the tournament, Maxwell asserted the fact that he needed to be taking wickets as well as scoring runs to maintain his place in the Australian line-up. Over the recent months his batting returns had dried up, an uncharacteristically quiet IPL followed by his omission from the Test squad for Sri Lanka. Still ensconced at No. 5 in the ODI batting order, his second ball of the night was a Narine offbreak that dipped nicely and turned savagely. Good a delivery as it was, Maxwell’s vague push at the line – without any regard for the spin clearly on offer – made it nigh on unplayable.

Two debutants opening the bowling, and the highest ODI score by a keeper

Also: the earliest international matches from which all 22 players are still alive

Steven Lynch04-Oct-2016Two debutants opened the bowling as Australia lost to South Africa the other day. Has this ever happened before? asked Mitchell Frazer from Australia
The two newcomers who had the chastening experience of sharing the new ball in Australia’s defeat by South Africa in Johannesburg on the weekend were Victoria’s Chris Tremain, who took 1 for 78, and Joe Mennie of South Australia, who ended up with 0 for 82. They were the first pair of debutants to share the new ball in an ODI for Australia since 1996-97, when Andy Bichel and Anthony Stuart did the honours against West Indies in Brisbane. There were four other instances for Australia in the early days of ODIs. Graham McKenzie and Alan “Froggy” Thomson took the new ball in the first ever official one-day international, against England in Melbourne in 1970-71. In Australia’s second match, against England at Old Trafford in 1972, Dennis Lillee and Bob Massie opened the bowling. Max Walker and Gary Gilmour took the new ball against New Zealand in Dunedin in 1973-74, while the following season Alan Hurst and Jeff Thomson started things off against England in Melbourne.Where does Quinton de Kock’s 178 stand on the list of highest ODI scores by a wicketkeeper? asked Hammad Shakil from Pakistan
There’s been only one higher individual score from a wicketkeeper than Quinton de Kock’s turbocharged 178 for South Africa against Australia in Centurion last week. That was 183 not out, by Mahendra Singh Dhoni for India against Sri Lanka in Jaipur in 2005-06. Next come Adam Gilchrist, with 172 for Australia against Zimbabwe in Hobart in 2003-04, and Luke Ronchi, with 170 not out for New Zealand v Sri Lanka in Dunedin in 2014-15. Kumar Sangakkara made 169 for Sri Lanka v South Africa in Colombo in 2013, and Denesh Ramdin 169 for West Indies against Bangladesh in Basseterre in 2014, while Gilchrist added 154 against Sri Lanka in Melbourne in 1998-99, as well as 149 against them in the 2007 World Cup final in Bridgetown. De Kock’s 11 sixes has been surpassed just six times in any ODI innings, and only once by someone who kept wicket in the same game – AB de Villiers smashed 16 sixes while scoring 149 from 44 balls for South Africa against West Indies in Johannesburg in January 2015.Six different South African bowlers took a wicket against Australia at the Wanderers. Was this a record? asked Hendrik Hitge
There were indeed six different wicket-takers as South Africa bowled Australia out for 219 in Johannesburg on the weekend – but the record for any one-day international is seven, which has happened four times. The first two were by New Zealand: against India in Auckland in 1975-76, and Sri Lanka in Dunedin in 1990-91. Netherlands had seven wicket-takers in their win over Bermuda in Rotterdam in 2007, as did Australia in overcoming Scotland in Edinburgh in 2009. The Test record is also seven, and that has also happened four times, most recently by New Zealand against South Africa in Centurion in 2005-06.What are the earliest Test and ODI from which all 22 players are still alive? asked Steve Austin from Australia
I hope I’m not tempting fate here in saying that the longest-ago Test match from which all the players are still with us is the first one between Australia and Pakistan in Adelaide in December 1972. All of them have thus survived nearly 44 years – and let’s hope there’s many more to come. The oldest single team who are all still alive is also Australian – their side in the second Test against South Africa in Cape Town in 1966-67, almost 50 years ago. All the Aussies are also still alive from the first-ever official one-day international, against England in Melbourne in 1970-71 (England, sadly, have lost two men from that game). The oldest ODI from which all 22 players survive is the one between England and New Zealand at Old Trafford in 1978.Rawle Brancker (right) toured England in 1966 but never played a Test•PA PhotosWas Mosaddek Hossain the first Bangladesh player to take a wicket with his first ball in ODIs? asked Savo Ceprnich
Offspinner Mosaddek Hossain played his first one-day international for Bangladesh last week, in Mirpur, and took the wicket of Afghanistan’s Hashmatullah Shahidi with his first delivery. He’s the 24th bowler to strike with his first ball in ODIs, but the first from Bangladesh. For the full list, click here.Another Bangladesh record was set in the third and final match of that series against Afghanistan, also in Mirpur: slow left-armer Mosharraf Hossain, 34, played his first match for nearly nine years. That puts him seventh on the overall list, just ahead of Faruk Ahmed, who went eight years 144 days between ODIs for Bangladesh between 1990 and 1999. For that list, click here.My dad left me a piece of paper signed by Garry Sobers and his 1966 West Indian side. There’s one name on there I can’t work out – it looks like “R. Barker”. Do you know who this is? asked David Fifield from England
That sounds like an interesting piece of memorabilia, from a famous team – Garry Sobers’ strong 1966 line-up won that year’s series in England 3-1. His team included big names like Rohan Kanhai, Conrad Hunte, Basil Butcher, Wes Hall, Charlie Griffith and Lance Gibbs, all among West Indies’ all-time greats. But there were some lesser lights. Two of that year’s 17-strong touring party never played a Test: the back-up fast bowler Rudolph Cohen, and the man I suspect you’re after… Rawle Brancker, a slow left-armer from Barbados. He played in most of the first-class matches outside the Tests, and finished with 33 wickets, including a career-best 7 for 78 against Kent in Canterbury, when his victims included Colin Cowdrey, Alan Knott, Brian Luckhurst and Derek Underwood. (Sobers took 9 for 49 in the second innings of that match.) Brancker also took 6 for 39 for Barbados against Combined Islands in Bridgetown earlier in 1966. He played his last first-class match early in 1970, ending up with 106 wickets at 27.32 – and an almost identical batting average (27.31). He was a handy lower-order batsman who hit five first-class centuries for Barbados, including one against the 1964-65 Australian tourists, when he shared a big stand with Sobers, who made 183.Post your questions using the comments below

Warner's stunning assault in vain, South Africa defend 327

ESPNcricinfo staff12-Oct-2016Mennie didn’t have to wait longer for his second as captain Faf du Plessis fell for 11•AFPRilee Rossouw started South Africa’s surge with a run-a-ball fifty, his eighth in ODIs•AFPJP Duminy returned to form and contributed 73 in a record 178-run, fourth-wicket stand•Associated PressAfter Duminy carved Mennie to backward point, Rossouw went on to strike 122, his third ODI century•Associated PressSouth Africa’s middle and lower order made handy contributions to lift the hosts to 327 for 8•Associated PressDavid Warner got Australia’s chase off to a flying start with a brisk fifty•Associated PressImran Tahir, though, struck with two wickets in three balls to reduce the visitors to 72 for 2•Associated PressAndile Phehulwayo had George Bailey bowled, but Warner kept the asking rate in check with regular boundaries•AFPWarner registered the highest score by an Australian against South Africa but was run-out for 173, with 40 still required off 19 balls•Associated PressSouth Africa had to wait for the third umpire to confirm their 5-0 whitewash of Australia. “We were just too good for them,” captain du Plessis said at the post-match presentation•AFP

Australia's first loss in season opener since 1988

Stats highlights from the final day in Perth, where South Africa completed a thumping win

Bharath Seervi07-Nov-201618 Number of consecutive home Tests without a defeat for Australia, before this match. Their last loss was also against South Africa at the WACA, in 2012-13. In the 18 Tests since then, they had won 14 and four were drawn.1988 When Australia last loss the first Test of the home season. That defeat was against West Indies at the Gabba. Since then, they had won 21 and drawn six in their season starters.2 Instances of Australia losing the first Test of any home series in the past 25 years. Incidentally, both have been against South Africa and at WACA. They lost defending 414 in 2008-09 and by 177 runs in this match. In 42 other home series since 1990, they won the first match on 32 occasions.3 Consecutive wins for South Africa at the WACA – joint second-most for them at any away venue. Only in Harare have they had more wins in succession (four). They also had three consecutive wins at Lord’s and in Port of Spain.3 Tests won by South Africa at the WACA – the most by any visiting team in Australia at a particular venue since 1990. In this period, England have won two each in Adelaide, at the MCG and the SCG, and West Indies have also won two in Perth. South Africa’s three wins have all been convincing: they successfully chased 414 in 2008-09 and won by 309 runs in 2012-13, before this 177-run victory.6 South Africa bowlers to take a five-wicket haul in the fourth innings against Australia. Kagiso Rabada’s 5 for 92 is the sixth such instance. The last to do so for South Africa in Australia was Fanie de Villiers at the SCG in 1993-94.17.20 Rabada’s average in the three Tests wins he has featured in. He has taken 25 wickets in these three Tests. In his other six Tests – three lost and three drawn – he has taken only 11 wickets at an average of 40.81.

India extend enviable Mohali record

This was India’s seventh win in 13 Tests at this venue, where they’re unbeaten since 1994

Shiva Jayaraman29-Nov-20167 Tests won by India out of the 13 they have played in Mohali; The only time they lost at this venue was in the inaugural Test at the venue, against West Indies 22 years ago. Since then India have won seven and drawn five matches. Their win-loss record of 7-0 at here is the third-best for any team at any venue the last 20 years.16 Number of consecutive undefeated Tests for India including this win – their second-longest unbeaten sequence. Their longest such sequence consisted of 17 matches between 1985 and 1987. Click here for a list of the longest undefeated sequence for any team.12 Number of Tests wins by Virat Kohli as captain – equals the most won by any India captain in his first 20 Tests. MS Dhoni had and identical win-loss record of 12-2 in his first-20 Tests. Only five other captains – Steve Waugh (15), Mike Brearley (14), Lindsay Hassett (14), Michael Vaughan (14) and Ricky Ponting (13) – have won more matches in their first 20 Tests.17-1 India’s win-loss record in Tests at home when they have lost the toss since the start of 2006 – by far the best for any team during this period. The next-best in this list are Australia who have a 16-5 record in 26 Tests at home when they have lost the toss. During the same period, India’s record when they win the toss at home is 14-4.4426* Gap in terms of number of days (12 years, 44 days) between Parthiv Patel’s Test fifty in India’s second innings and his previous one – against Australia in Chennai in 2004, the second biggest t for any Indian. Lala Amarnath had the longest such gap. In a career paused by the World War II, he went 12 years and 190 days between his century against England in Mumbai in 1933 and his fifty at Lord’s in 1946.11 Number of fifty-plus scores by Joe Root in Tests in 2016 – the most by any batsman this year. There have been only four instances when an England batsman has made 11 or more fifty-plus score in a calendar year. Root himself leads this list with 13 such scores in 2015.640 Number of balls faced by Haseeb Hameed in the series so far – already the sixth-highest by any batsman in his debut series in Tests since 2000. Michael Clarke is the only batsman to have faced more deliveries than Hameed on a debut series in India. Clarke faced 722 balls in his debut series in 2004-05. Hameed has faced by the second-most balls by any batsman in this series.66 Runs by Murali Vijay in the last-five innings after his hundred in the first innings in Rajkot. Vijay’s average from the third Test of any series witnesses a steep drop as compared with the first-two Tests. He averages 33.47, 25.50 and 10.00 (from one Test) in the third, fourth and fifth Tests of series. In the first-two Tests, he averages 44.67.* Days calculated from the start of the Tests

Guptill the talk of town and country

There is a plan for Martin Guptill to challenge for a Test middle-order berth in the future, but he is priceless to New Zealand’s one-day side, and that should remain his priority

Andrew McGlashan02-Mar-2017New Zealand was talking about cricket on Thursday morning. There has been significant interest in the contests against South Africa, but there was a hint of the 2015 World Cup vibe in the aftermath of Martin Guptill’s unbeaten 180 in Hamilton.It was a shame the innings did not have a bigger crowd to witness it than 2264 – a result, largely, of the reasonably late change of venue when the game was moved from Napier – but Guptill was a main topic of breakfast TV and radio while there was a bigger-than-average media huddle to speak to coach Mike Hesson in Auckland.”As good as it gets,” Hesson said. “It’s hard to beat quarter-final 200 [against West Indies], but that came close. He hit the ball well at training, but I don’t think anyone expected that. His composure in the chase showed he was never satisfied.”Guptill is a cricketer of contrasts. A one-day record to stand up against anyone – and above many – but Test numbers that, despite the occasional sparkle, are nondescript. That should not matter a jot. It is perfectly natural for Guptill to want the chance to improve his long-form numbers, but he changes the dynamic of New Zealand’s one-day top order so much that it should remain the priority.If he is part of a New Zealand side that wins the Champions Trophy this year, or the World Cup in 2019, that will be his legacy. Not whether he can lift his Test average from 29 to 32. Against the white ball, there is no one in New Zealand who can replicate what Guptill provides. It certainly looks like Kings XI Punjab have picked up a bargain for the IPL.He was dropped from the Test side at the beginning of the home summer and won’t be making a swift return. Hesson is not a man to suddenly make a u-turn and confirmed he would not feature against South Africa.His latest run, from being recalled against England in 2015, was 16 matches in which he averaged 28.93. That came after a stellar World Cup – further evidence that success in one format does not mean success in another. There was the occasional highlight, such as his 156 against Sri Lanka, but only five other half-centuries in 30 innings, although one of those did come in his last Test against India at Indore.If there is a future for Guptill in Test cricket, it will be in the middle order with New Zealand having hatched a plan with Auckland for him to bat in that position when he returns to Plunket Shield action. He averages 43.37 from nine innings in positions four to six, mostly in 2010, though that is padded considerably by 245 runs in one match against Bangladesh.”Martin and I have certainly talked about Test cricket a lot and he certainly gave batting at the top of the order a fairly good crack,” Hesson said. “But the middle order is something we are keen to explore at the first-class level first. Martin and Auckland Cricket are certainly receptive to that, which is great. At the moment, it’s a difficult spot to find. Our Test team has won four on the bounce and the middle order is performing well, but certainly something we’ll look to explore.”While Guptill’s most recent spell in the Test side was ultimately unconvincing, Hesson said that a greater experience had helped him deal with the fluctuating fortunes of the game, as evidenced by the fact that while his Test form oscillated, the two years from the start of the 2015 World Cup have seen him become the second-most prolific one-day batsman behind David Warner, who he is quickly catching.”Cricket does that, you have more failures than success, and as a young player, you have to cope with that,” Hesson said. “Martin’s confident in his game and has reached a level of maturity where he’s consistent and perhaps doesn’t ride the highs and lows younger players do. He’s comfortable in his skin and batting well.”Batting well is an understatement, and Guptill can stand among the finest limited-overs batsmen of all-time. New Zealand will hope starting at Eden Park on Saturday he gets the country talking again.

UAE's IPL boy

From floating around the fringes of the national team, Chirag Suri has received an unexpected boost in the pursuit of his cricketing dream

Paul Radley26-Feb-2017Chirag Suri is already feeling the effects of being “the IPL boy”. The day after becoming the first UAE player to be recruited to any of cricket’s big leagues, he was back in the nets at the ICC Academy in Dubai.Dougie Brown, the UAE coach, congratulated him on his feat in front of his national team colleagues. His fellow players, Suri says, were “ecstatic” about him signing for Gujarat Lions. But they are gunning for him too.”There is a bit of extra pressure on me now, even in training,” said Suri, a 22-year-old batsman who was born in Delhi and raised in Dubai. “The lads have been joking around, telling me I can’t do this or that in the IPL. And it feels really bad whenever I get out now.”That will make me concentrate more. I think people feel I have always had it in me, but it is all about being consistent. I need to put more of a price on my wicket now.”The realisation has not taken long to dawn on him. Making it onto an IPL roster was quite some achievement, but the hard work starts here. “I’m really enjoying the moment,” Suri said. “But I’ve been back in training, trying to work harder with a goal like this in mind.”Suri watched the IPL auction on TV at home in Dubai from its start until his lot, No. 245, came up. His father, Bobby, had gone to his construction-firm job in Dubai before returning in time to see his son’s name go under the hammer. Between those two, and mother Gauri, plenty of tears were shed when he was bought by Lions, for a base price of Rs 10 lakh (approximately US$15,000).

“There is a bit of extra pressure on me now, even in training. The lads have been joking around, telling me I can’t do this or that in the IPL”Suri on the immediate effects of his IPL signing

His has been a startling elevation. When Lions play their first matches in the IPL, against Kolkata Knight Riders on April 7 and Sunrisers Hyderabad two days later, UAE will be playing a four-day Intercontinental Cup match against Papua New Guinea in Abu Dhabi. Suri has not thought to ask to be excused from that yet. He does not presume to think he will even be in the UAE team.He has been on the fringes of the national team since he debuted against Kenya in the World Cup Qualifier in New Zealand in 2014. In the few chances he has had to make himself undroppable, he has missed out.It is fair to suggest he has jumped the queue when it comes to UAE players reaching the big leagues. Four UAE internationals, for example, have made it into the Pakistan Super League draft list in the past. Shaiman Anwar, UAE’s leading batsman and No. 24 in the ICC rankings for T20 batsmen, was on the list ahead of the league’s first season in 2016. Rohan Mustafa, Mohammed Naveed and Ahmed Raza did the same this season. None of them were picked, though.Suri reasons that his chances of making it were enhanced by his youth. He is within the under-23 bracket for emerging players. And now, he says, he hopes he can push the door further ajar for everybody else.”All the lads were ecstatic for me, giving me their best wishes and support,” Suri said. “Shaiman has been really trying to get into the PSL. Hopefully next year he can get through as well. The lads are more confident of getting through now, because Associate players are getting more of a name in the leagues.”In becoming the first UAE player to break into a high-profile league, Suri has leapfrogged more established names, such as his country’s leading batsman, Shaiman Anwar (in picture)•Peter Della PennaThere are eight full-time professional players contracted to the Emirates Cricket Board. Suri is not one of them. Alongside playing cricket, he studies for a degree in business management at Heriot Watt University in Dubai, as well as learning the family marble and granite construction business.Talented players are often lost to the system in the UAE between the ages of 18 to 21, when they travel abroad for study, or enter the workplace. Bobby Suri, though, is encouraging his son to pursue his dream of playing cricket for as long as he can.”Their parents want them to make their careers somewhere else and not in cricket,” Suri Sr. said of the cricketers who fall by the wayside in the UAE. “To be honest, I am a businessman. I have always told Chirag, ‘While you keep playing, I will remain young. So keep playing, please, do this for me.’ That is all the reward I want: for him to keep playing.”Bobby moved his family to Dubai from his native Delhi in 2003, when he relocated for work. Chirag, who had just started playing cricket when they moved, subsequently went on to represent UAE at all age-group levels, occasionally as captain.One of his junior coaches was Shahzad Altaf, who played as a bowler for UAE in the 1996 World Cup on the subcontinent, and has since produced a variety of players for the national team via his academy.” I was surprised when I heard Chirag got an IPL deal, but it is good for him and hopefully he will perform,” Altaf said. “I think he could do something, but that level is very high. I think he could do it, if he gets regular chances.”

“I have always told Chirag, ‘While you keep playing, I will remain young. So keep playing, please, do this for me.'”Chirag Suri’s father, Bobby

According to Suri, Aaqib Javed, the former UAE coach, told him four years ago that he would play in the IPL at some point in the future. That was either unbelievable foresight or a conceit designed to boost a player’s self-belief ahead of coming challenges.Back then, Suri was part of a UAE side that was facing matches against the likes of India and Pakistan in the Under-19 Asia Cup, and then in the Under-19 World Cup. India’s side had the likes of Sanju Samson – who was already an IPL star – and Sarfaraz Khan. Pakistan had Sami Aslam. South Africa won that World Cup, largely thanks to the excellence of Kagiso Rabada. With pedigree like that in the opposition, Suri and the schoolboys of the UAE team probably needed a pep up.Aaqib maintains Suri has the talent to impress with Gujarat, though. He thinks his former protégé has a “personality suited to challenges”. “It is a good opportunity,” said Aaqib, who coached the UAE until last year. “The IPL is a huge thing. It is really encouraging for any UAE player.”Suri understands Aaqib’s assessment of his personality traits. “When I get something positive or negative in my life, I don’t get fazed by it,” he said. “If something happens to me, I don’t think about it a lot, I just keep a positive outlook. Things always charge me up, and that is probably what Aaqib meant. If I am seen as the IPL boy, I will take that as a positive.”

'I think we can be in the top four this season'

Kim Barnett, Derbyshire’s new director of cricket, has big ambitions for the county, and he wants to create an environment where players take more responsibility

David Hopps13-Apr-2017To understand how Kim Barnett is once again centre stage at Derbyshire, determined to shake them from another long period of struggle, it is probably best to start with the story of his heart attack. It came six years ago during a troubled period that had the messy break-up of his second marriage at its heart. It was hard to imagine then that one day he would once again be the most influential cricketing figure in the county.”I didn’t make it public,” he said. “I had a heart attack one night and went into hospital and a bloke came in and said, ‘I can sort this out if you want; sign this form.’ I was on the operating table in no time, he removed whatever he needed to remove, and the next morning I felt great.”If Barnett was a bit sketchy on the exact procedure, it is apparent that his tenacity was left in place. Immediately after his release from hospital, flouting doctors’ orders to take it easy for three months, he turned out for Bignall End in the North Staffordshire League. It was a nice day, he fancied a bat and he didn’t want to let anybody down.”I didn’t tell them. They knew nothing about it. The captain asked me if I fancied a bowl and I thought to myself, ‘I’d better not today.’ I had a bat and got about 20. Nothing alarming happened, so I thought ‘well it’s got to get better from here’.”Barnett is Derbyshire cricketing royalty, a status once granted in the pages of the , which knows better than most. He captained them for 13 seasons, first taking up the job as a 22-year-old. In the most glorious phase in their history, he scored most runs, made most centuries, and played in three of only five trophy successes since they first joined the County Championship in 1895.

“I was asked to do a report on Derbyshire’s underperformance. Once the board read it, it was decided somebody had to have total authority to put this right. And here I am”Barnett on how he was made Derbyshire’s director of cricket

Royalty or not, his abdication was not a happy one. Amid talk of rifts, he left for Gloucestershire in 1999, where his strategic talent in limited-overs cricket later led John Bracewell, who also coached New Zealand, to remember him as a walking Duckworth-Lewis machine even before the rain tables had been invented, a man skilled in plotting a course to victory in infinite detail. When Barnett retired, Derbyshire’s committee refused the request of the captain, Dominic Cork, for him to return. Typical, wrote one of the county’s keenest observers, of a county forever lost in “black passions and scarlet enmities”.Barnett coached in schools, and in Staffordshire, and delivered cars to clients for a luxury car company until he drove one off the road on an icy night.The heart attack, and all that came with it, seemed likely to encourage him into early retirement. But shortly afterwards, Barnett was enticed by Derbyshire’s chairman, Chris Grant, to rebuild links with the club. Before too long, he was offered the presidency and says that the woman who would go on to become his third wife, Sue, a retired police officer, persuaded him it would be an interesting way to pass the time.Barnett, though, is not designed for a ceremonial role. Derbyshire did not win a single Championship match in 2016 and flopped in both limited-overs tournaments. When he was invited to write a report on the club’s affairs, he was not found wanting. Last September, as part of the restructuring, he was made Derbyshire’s director of cricket, a job that has come 15 years too late.”We had been playing what people perceived to be poorly, but we have been through that many times,” he said. “Certainly in the ’70s, before I started, the record wasn’t great and people were getting a bit fretful. So I was asked to do a report on it. I thought, ‘Okay, 10 to 15 pages.’ It ended up about 70. Once the board read it, it was decided somebody had to have total authority to put this right. And here I am.””If they want to call me director of cricket and give it a big title, that’s fine, but now the restructuring is done, I just coordinate”•Derbyshire CCCThe outcome of the Barnett report was the scrapping of Derbyshire’s “elite performance” coaching structure, which invested heavily in the skills and authority of coaches. Its instigator, Graeme Welch, had resigned mid-season, and it was not long before Barnett dismantled his vision, adamant that money should be rerouted to the playing budget and more control and responsibility should be put back in the hands of the players.”The danger with an elite coaching model is that people take more credit than they should,” Barnett said. “Eventually people think, ‘People are not playing well, my job is at risk, so I have to go and shout at them’, and eventually the players think, ‘It’s not our plan, I am not in charge of my own career.'”That reverses everything I believe in – that you support players, you give them information, you get them to the point where they are doing something with it and ultimately it is up to them. How do you want to play? What help do we give you?”If they want to call me director of cricket and give it a big title, that’s fine, but now the restructuring is done, I just co-ordinate. I’m doing managing and strategy and turning up where I want. If they tell me something is a shambles I will sort it out but I won’t be telling them what to do.”Instead of a bank of full-time coaches, specialist freelance coaches – John Emburey for spin bowling, Jack Russell for wicketkeeping and Graham Gooch for batting – will supplement a smaller coaching staff from time to time. In their absence, senior players will be expected to pass on their knowledge.

Barnett was adamant that money should be rerouted to the playing budget and more control and responsibility should be put back in the hands of the players

There is an imaginative approach in T20, too, where John Wright, coach of Mumbai Indians and a former Derbyshire player, is one of only two specialist T20 coaches in the NatWest Blast.”John has a great record with Mumbai Indians. He is a hard competitor, the perfect guy. We are rubbish at T20, one of only two counties who have never been to Finals Day. I said, ‘Can you come and teach us, and teach our coaches, how to play it?'”Even as the youngest captain in Derbyshire’s history, Barnett was not to be trifled with: almost from the outset, he had strong opinions on how the game should be played. He insists the impetus for his return comes from identifying in Derbyshire’s captain, Billy Godleman, something of “the Barnett of old”.Since becoming the second youngest cricketer ever to play for Middlesex, at 17, Godleman’s career has not quite kicked on. A stormy phase at Essex was followed by a bit of a backwater move to Derbyshire; he was awarded the captaincy in 2016 and a desperately poor season ensued. Barnett wants to free up an unfulfilled talent.”I wouldn’t have taken the job without knowing Billy’s potential because I thought, ‘This guy is tough.’ And we have some decent guys in the 2nd XI who just need someone to lead them. When I was playing, I was a far more aggressive person. Now I want to be a bit more tranquil and I want to do something for somebody else, rather than wresting away, wanting to prove myself for my own career.”Barnett sees something of his younger self in Derbyshire’s captain, Billy Godleman•Getty ImagesDerbyshire’s history has been one of adversity. Barnett still remembers being taken aback at the reaction of Bob Taylor, Derbyshire’s England wicketkeeper, when they beat Yorkshire for the first time in 26 years at Abbeydale Park in 1983 and Geoffrey Boycott carried his bat.”Bob got the champagne out afterwards. I thought that was a bit over the top, and he said he had never beaten Yorkshire and he planned to celebrate it. That’s the difference between a Derbyshire history and a Yorkshire history. We have patches where we are bottom or nearly bottom and then a batch of people come along and we have a better patch.”I suppose the biggest concern for the smaller counties like Derbyshire is that first-class cricket is ultimately going to be taken away.”Throughout Derbyshire’s history, they have mostly been sustained by the quality of their seam bowlers, such as Les Jackson, a stalwart of the 1950s who took more wickets for the county than any other bowler. He played cricket in the summer and worked just as hard in the mines in the winter; so tied was he to this most demanding of industries that in later years he worked as a chauffeur for the National Coal Board.Harold Rhodes’ England prospects as the ’60s dawned were wrecked by a throwing controversy. A decade or so later, Alan Ward was briefly the fastest thing around. “Bring Back Ward!” the once demanded during times of England struggle, only to change the headline in its southern editions to “Bring Back Snow!”While Barnett chatted enthusiastically about the season ahead on the edge of the Derby outfield – no longer the windswept wasteland upon which he cut his captaincy teeth – he received a call from Mike Hendrick, a miserly back-of-a-length seamer who could boast a Test average lower than the likes of Harold Larwood, John Snow or Ian Botham but who rarely gained the credit for it. Hendrick is back as cricket advisory director and sounds like just the man to help Barnett keep the board in place.

“That’s the difference between a Derbyshire history and a Yorkshire history. We have patches where we are bottom or nearly bottom and then a batch of people come along and we have a better patch”

Then there was Devon Malcolm, who, though his fielding and batting could be comically myopic, produced one of Test cricket’s great spells of fast bowling when he took 9 for 57 at The Oval against the 1994 South Africans, enraged by a bouncer that had struck him on the helmet while batting. Cork, too, whose opinions will be put to good use once T20 comes around.Barnett stayed true to this tradition as captain, emphasising the need to rotate a squad of fast bowlers, and unapologetically seeking to win home matches on green pitches. The toss regulations introduced last season, where the visiting team can bowl first by choice, make such a tactic a non-starter. So Barnett’s Derbyshire, for virtually the only time in their history, will put the onus on winning matches with legspin. There are three of them – Sri Lankan Jeevan Mendis for the first phase of the season, Imran Tahir once his IPL duties are over, and the local tyro Matt Critchley, back from a close season in Australia and eager to learn as much as he can.”In my days we would just make the pitches green and like meadows, throw the ball to the likes of Michael Holding and Ole Mortensen and see who came out on top. You can’t do that now, so how are we going to win these four-day matches? Spin’s a good option.”I am shocking myself to wonder about playing two legspinners in the same side at Derby. It can’t be right, can it? I must be dreaming. But I think Imran will bring Critch on, who is a superbly talented lad.”We have to try and dry the pitch out somehow. The groundsman is looking forward to the challenge. You just want to win cricket matches. Last year we lost six fair and square, and of the draws, we had half-a-dozen opportunities and we weren’t good enough to take them.”Near the end of last season, the chairman said to me, ‘We need to get some loan signings in to stop us being bottom.’ I said, ‘Bottom or second bottom, it doesn’t matter – it still has the word bottom in it.’ I am not saying we are going to go from bottom to top this season but I think we can be in the top four.”

Sunshine and rain: A story of two southern summers

New Zealand and South Africa played each other at the start and end of their seasons, and plenty went on in between

Firdose Moonda in Hamilton29-Mar-2017The sky was smiling. Lit up a gorgeous shade of golden-blue, it looked down on Kingsmead and declared that an early summer had dawned.It was only August 2016 but South Africa were hosting New Zealand for some unusually timed Tests in an attempt to elongate the season. Things were going well until a massive storm on the second evening caused damage that rendered the recently relaid outfield unplayable for three days. And so it began.Two teams on similar journeys were at the start of an 11-Test campaign to redefine themselves. Here’s how it went.The situation
New Zealand started a few weeks before South Africa with a gentle introduction in Zimbabwe, but one they took seriously. Far more challenging tasks awaited – away in South Africa and India before a seven-Test home summer. Their initial goal was to start winning away from home more often.South Africa were starting from as low a base as they have known. Their defeats to India and England the year before put them at No. 7 in the Test rankings and they had to overcome the embarrassment of falling so far. They started and ended with series against New Zealand, with a trip to Australia and a home series against Sri Lanka in between.The captains
Kane Williamson was confirmed New Zealand’s all-format captain in April and it was seen as nothing more than a man fulfilling his destiny. Despite being only 25, Williamson was thought capable of dealing with the dual responsibility of leading with the bat and leading the side without many problems. And the numbers proved it. In his 13 Tests as captain, Williamson scored 1079 runs at an average of 59.94 – higher than his overall average of 51.16 – with four hundreds. Two of them came in the home series against South Africa, and though they were made in drawn Tests, they were among his classiest knocks, full of composure and confidence against a strong attack.”The thing the team likes most is the fact that he so selfless,” Mike Hesson, New Zealand’s coach, said of Williamson. “He doesn’t do it for effect, he does it because that’s what he cares about. That’s his priority – the team. And what drives him is to win games.”Faf du Plessis was filling in as captain for most of the season, but took South Africa to No. 2 in the end•AFPFaf du Plessis was only standing in as South Africa’s Test captain when the season began but did such a good job that the injured AB de Villiers handed over the responsibility permanently. Du Plessis is a more natural leader than de Villiers, measured in his decision-making and inspirational in his actions. His team-mates threw their support behind him through a ball-tampering scandal in Australia and have responded to almost all of his challenges.Since taking over, du Plessis has scored 744 runs at 57.23, well above his overall average of 44.92, including two hundreds.”He walks the walk. He demands a lot from his players but he’s willing to go out there and live up to those demands that he places upon the team,” South Africa’s coach, Russell Domingo, said of du Plessis. “I’m very proud about the way he’s gone about his business.”The coaches
Following a successful 2015 World Cup, Hesson was guaranteed he would stay in charge of New Zealand until 2019, so he went into this summer secure about his job, unlike Domingo, who faced the chop after the ODI team was booted from the Caribbean tri-series. At the time, Cricket South Africa had also instituted a review process (later postponed, and then finally completed) and one of the areas under scrutiny was Domingo’s position.Domingo entered the summer with all of that weighing on him, but by October, he could breathe easier. He was given an extension until the end of the England tour, in August this year. Irrespective of the outcome of that series, though, Domingo’s job is not assured. Good corporate governance dictates that CSA must advertise for a coach, and though Domingo can reapply, he remains unsure of whether he will do so. South Africa could head to the 2019 World Cup under a new coach.Ross Taylor’s season was interrupted by injuries•AFPAbsent senior batsmen
After tearing his calf in the Dunedin Test, Ross Taylor joked that his only goal for the next few summers was to make sure he can get through them uninjured, particularly against South Africa. Taylor has missed some part of New Zealand’s last three series against them for various reasons. He also underwent eye surgery, which kept him out of the Chappell-Hadlee series, to add to problems with his hamstrings and fingers. He remains hopeful of staying fit for a swansong in 2019.AB de Villiers started the summer with an elbow problem that was treated conservatively at first, but then required surgery. He was ruled out of action until early 2017, and then he announced a Test hiatus for most of the year. De Villiers wanted to manage his workload so he could make it to the 2019 World Cup and has committed to playing only ODIs and the IPL for the moment. He said he will aim for a Test comeback against India in the home summer this December.JP Duminy and Hashim Amla drew a lot of focus in a troubled top order•Gallo ImagesFragile batting line-ups
Both teams had to settle on new opening combinations this summer and only one of them has had success. New Zealand dumped Martin Guptill for the technically sound Jeet Raval at the start of the home Tests, and Raval has combined well with Tom Latham, who had a great summer despite a slump early on at home against South Africa.South Africa invested in Stephen Cook at the end of the 2015-16 season and gave him a run until Hamilton, by when his three hundreds in 11 Tests had been overshadowed by his poor away form. Theunis de Bruyn may be given the same chance, but early indications are that South Africa need to find someone else to partner Dean Elgar, who has bedded in as the senior with hundreds in three of the four series played.The teams also have questions in the middle order. Neil Broom did not have the best start at No. 4, but Henry Nicholls finally came good at No. 5 with a hundred in Wellington and will hope to build on that. For South Africa, JP Duminy continues to misfire, and with Hashim Amla also struggling, their seniors are in a slump. Temba Bavuma made up for it, though. Despite no hundreds this summer, he scored runs when South Africa needed them most – in Perth, Hobart and Wellington – and has been compared to Ashwell Prince for his ability to be the bridge over troubled waters.Wicked keepers
In years to come, there will be calls for both BJ Watling and Quinton de Kock to move up the order, but they are both kingpins at No. 7. Watling’s solidity adds depth to New Zealand’s line-up, while de Kock has the ability to change Tests single-handedly and is savvy in batting with the tail.Colin de Grandhomme was a revelation in New Zealand’s bowling attack this season•Getty ImagesInjured fast bowlers
This summer New Zealand went through what South Africa did in the last one, as their two premier pacemen took turns being injured. Tim Southee’s ankle ruled him out of the India Tests and his hamstring forced him out of Hamilton. Trent Boult picked up a groin strain and missed the last two Tests of this series.That Neil Wagner had played only one Test without either of them since debut tells you how much New Zealand have come to rely on Southee and Boult. Unlike South Africa, who shuffled through various options without success, New Zealand’s second-tier stepped up. Matt Henry took his opportunities against both Pakistan and South Africa, and so did Colin de Grandhomme, whose medium pace puts him in the Vernon Philander mould. Wagner was his usual relentless self and gave New Zealand a lot to work with.South Africa had a more settled attack following Philander’s comeback, mostly because of the control he provides. Dale Steyn came back too, but was soon injured again and remains out until June at least, but Morne Morkel’s return was the most inspiring. After 14 months nursing a career-threatening back injury, Morkel returned against New Zealand with pace and precision to lead South Africa’s attack. Add Kagiso Rabada and Duanne Olivier to the mix, along with Chris Morris and Wayne Parnell, and South Africa seem well stocked.Keshav Maharaj was the find of the summer, according to his captain•Getty ImagesThe spinner
New Zealand’s opted for a young spinner in Mitchell Santner at the start of the season, and then included a more senior player in Mark Craig, before he was injured in India. Their most interesting inclusion was Jeetan Patel, who was called back from a successful county stint, for the South Africa series. Patel may not be a long-term solution but New Zealand see him as a mentor.”He is helping us develop a few other spinners at the same time,” Hesson said. “He is the most consistent spinner we’ve got and a really nice filler for us now. He gets the best out of the other bowlers and has sped up their learning.”South Africa fared better in this department with left-arm spinner Keshav Maharaj, described as the “find of the summer” by du Plessis. Maharaj was the top wicket-taker in New Zealand and also performed admirably in Australia. Although not a big turner of the ball, his control is his asset and he benefitted from pressure created by the quicks. Dane Piedt started the summer against New Zealand and was then dropped; he was recalled at the end, and though he did not play, he remains in contention.The end
The sky was sullen. Hidden behind stubborn clouds, it could not look down on Seddon Park. It is March 2017. South Africa and New Zealand have met again in an intriguing contest, but the rain forecast for all five days fell on the final morning. And so it ended.

How the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern method works

An explanation of the basic principles behind how targets and par scores in rain-affected games are decided

S Rajesh08-Jun-20175:16

All you need to know about the DLS method

How does DLS work?

The DLS (Duckworth-Lewis-Stern) method works on the principle that a batting team has two resources in hand when starting an ODI innings: 300 balls, and ten wickets. As the innings progresses, these resources keep depleting, and eventually reaches zero when a team either plays out all 300 deliveries, or loses all 10 wickets.When, due to any reason, the batting team loses overs, they are denied the opportunity to make full use of their resources. Targets are hence revised in a way that is proportional to the amount of resources available to each team.The rate at which these resources deplete isn’t uniform across the overs, but varies depending on the scoring patterns of ODIs (calculated from studying matches over several years). At any point, the resources lost due to an interruption depends on:

  • number of overs lost
  • stage of an innings when the overs are lost
  • wickets in hand at the time of the interruption

Losing overs in the later stages of an innings will usually impact a team more than losing the same number of overs earlier in an innings, as those overs are more productive, and teams have less opportunity to recalibrate their targets than if overs are lost early in the innings. A team which is already six down after 20 overs will have lesser to lose from a 10-over interruption, than a team which is, say, only two down at that stage. That is because in the first case, the team has already lost a huge chunk of their batting resources by the dismissals of six top-order batsmen. A team which is only two down can better capitalize on the last 30 overs than a team which is six down.

Do wickets lost after the interruption impact the chasing team’s target?

No, they don’t. According to DLS, a team exhausts its entire resources either when it is bowled out, or when it plays the full quota of overs. So, a score of 300 all out in 48 overs is the same as a score of 300 for 6 in 50 overs (in a 50-over game). What matters, though, is the number of wickets lost at the time of the interruption: the fewer the wickets lost, the greater is the opportunity cost of the overs lost for the batting team. A team which is only three down after 40 overs is likely to score more than a team which is eight down, and that is reflected in the targets that DLS sets.

Why does the target for the team batting second sometimes reduce after an interruption in the first innings, even though both teams have the same number of overs?

Sometimes, when the team batting first has lost several early wickets, a reduction of overs is beneficial to them. For instance, if a team is 80 for 6 after 20, they will benefit from a reduced game. If 20 overs are lost and they finish on 140, DLS will readjust the 30-over target for the chasing team to 121. That is because the team batting first had already lost a huge chunk of their batting resources before the interruption, and would probably have been bowled out well before 50 overs anyway. The chasing team, however, have been denied the opportunity to bat up to 50 overs to chase a relatively low score. To redress that balance, their target is reduced to 121.Another example: in the second game of the 2017 Champions Trophy, for instance, Australia’s 46-over target stayed at 292 (New Zealand made 291) after a four-over loss when New Zealand were 67 for 1 in 9.3. Had they been 67 for 4 and then finished with the same total, Australia’s target would have come down to 284.Hence, if the batting team senses that rain is imminent, the smart thing to do would be to keep wickets in hand, to ensure they maximize the benefits of DLS.

What is the difference between par score and target score?

Par score is the total that a chasing team should have reached – when they are ‘X’ wickets down – at the time of an interruption; target is the revised score that a team is required to get after an interruption. In a nutshell, par scores are calculated an interruption, while targets are calculated an interruption. The target is one fixed number, while the par score changes according to the number of wickets lost.For instance, the Champions Trophy match between Australia and Bangladesh match which was recently washed out, the par scores for Australia after 20 overs were 41 for 0, 48 for 1, 58 for 2, 69 for 3, 84 for 4 and so on. If the interruption had happened at 20 overs and no further play was possible, Australia would have been declared winners for exceeding the par score corresponding to the number of wickets they had lost. If they hadn’t, Bangaldesh would have won.If it had rained during the innings break, leaving Australia with only 20 overs to bat, then their revised target, with all ten wickets in hand, would have been 109 in 20 overs.

How do net run rate calculations change in matches where DLS comes in?

In matches affected by DLS, the score for the team batting first is taken as the par score at the time of the interruption (if no further play is possible), or as one run less than the target (in case a revised target is set). Thus, in the case of the Australia-Bangladesh match, if Australia were one down at the time of the interruption at 20 overs, then Bangladesh’s score for the purposes of NRR calculation would be 48. If Australia had been set a target of 109 in 20, then Bangladesh’s score would be taken as 108 in 20.The logic behind this is simple: the NRR of the winning team should always be greater than zero, and higher than the losing team in that game. Else, there could be situations where the winning team could be ahead of the par score, but have a run rate lower than the end-of-innings rate of the team which batted first. For instance, Australia, at 50 for 1 after 20, would have been ahead of par, but their run rate of 2.5 would have been below Bangladesh’s innings run rate of 3.66. That wouldn’t make cricketing sense. Adjusting the score of the team batting first ensures that the team which wins the game always has a positive NRR for that match.